Engoo
Republished on (Originally released on )
Though similar, "can" and "be able to" are different in three important ways:
This post will explain each of these differences so you can use them both confidently in your English conversations.
"Be able to” has only one function: to talk about ability.
"Can," however, has many functions.
For example, the question “Can you come to my party tomorrow?” could mean both “Are you able to come?” and “Is it possible for you to come?”
Learners sometimes make sentences like “Tickets are able to be purchased online” or “This product is able to be used in a microwave.”
However, in these examples, it sounds like the tickets and the product have abilities. Since objects do not have abilities, though, this is incorrect.
"Can” is better in these cases.
Both "can" and “be able to” are used in casual conversations, and you can usually use either without changing a sentence's meaning.
For example, if a friend invited you to a party, you could reply with either of the following sentences:
However, "be able to" sounds a little more formal, so it's common for people to use "can" most of the time.
Basically, if you want to emphasize ability (instead of possibility), use "be able to." In other situations, you can simply use "can."
In formal English, especially in writing, it’s usually better to be specific. This is why you’ll see “be able to” more often than “can” in news articles that mention ability.
You’ve probably also seen “be able to” in error messages when you’re using a computer. For example, if you have trouble buying something online, you might see messages like these:
In addition to being more specific, “be able to” also sounds more indirect and impersonal than “can.” For example, you’ve probably also received emails that say something like this:
In situations like these, “unable to” sounds more polite than “cannot.”
“Could” and “was able to” are used to talk about abilities people had in the past. For example, the two sentences below mean the same thing.
And here are two sentences in the negative about the past that have the same meaning.
But when we want to talk about past abilities involving a specific incident, things get tricky. For example, try to put the following sentence in the past tense.
You might think “Sally could find a job … ” is the answer, but the "could" here is not the past tense of "can" — instead, it's the conditional form (“Sally could find a job if she tried”).
The correct answer is: "Sally was able to find a job in New York after graduating."
You can also say, "Sally could have found a job in New York after graduating" if she had the ability to get a job there but didn't for some reason (for example, maybe she chose to work in another city).
So when you’re talking about past abilities, pay extra attention to the choice between "can" and "be able to"!
If you want to talk about future abilities, use “be able to.”
If you just want to talk about future plans, “can” is better.
Since “can” is a modal verb, it can’t be used after other verbs. This is why the following sentences use “be able to.”
As a modal verb, “can” doesn't have a continuous (-ing) form or a perfect form. So when you need to use these tenses, use “be able to.”
Here’s a quick summary to help you review.
Now it’s time to practice! The following sentences all have a mistake. Try to find them.
To find out the answers, book a lesson on Engoo! Engoo has thousands of tutors available any time of day and plenty of free materials you can study with. Give it a try!